“Most production slippage is still cheap to fix when it first appears. The challenge is spotting it early enough.”
Key takeaways
Production art briefs are built for accuracy. Marketing art briefs are built for impact, and the two do not overlap as much as studios assume.
Key art has to carry an emotional hook, read as a silhouette at tiny sizes, and leave room for logos and platform overlays.
Platform specs like Steam capsules, app store icons, and social crops each have their own pixel dimensions that a production brief never covers.
A real marketing art brief documents target placements, safe zones, the emotional hook, and crop strategy separately from production references.
Write production and marketing briefs as two documents, not one, and match the right brief to the right deliverable.
Marketing Art for Games: Why It Needs a Different Brief Than Production Art
“The brief that built your game won’t sell it.”
![]()
A studio sends over its character sheets, environment references, and style guide, and asks for a Steam capsule and a few social posts. The result comes back on-model and beautifully rendered. However, does not fit the canvas, has nowhere for the logo, and disappears into noise at thumbnail size. Nothing was done wrong, but the wrong brief was used.
As a game art studio, we spend a good part of our time on marketing material for the games we help produce: capsules, key art, trailer stills, social campaigns, not just character sheets and environments. Having already built a game’s characters, world, and style puts us in a strong position for that work, since there is no re-briefing on tone or accuracy needed. That head start does not replace a dedicated marketing brief, though. The two are still different jobs.
Production art and marketing art solve different problems, and a brief built for one fails the other almost every time. This article covers:
- Why a production art brief doesn’t work for marketing art
- What marketing art actually has to do
- The platform specs a production brief never mentions
- What belongs in a real marketing art brief
Why a Production Art Brief Doesn’t Work for Marketing Art
A production art brief is built around accuracy. It defines style, proportions, technical constraints, and how an asset fits into the game. A marketing art brief is built around impact. The two rarely overlap as much as studios expect.
| Production art | Marketing art | |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Serve the game | Sell the game |
| Audience | The dev team and the engine | A stranger scrolling in under a second |
| Constraints | Style guide, polycount, engine specs | Platform aspect ratios, safe zones, file specs |
| Success measure | Matches the brief, imports correctly | Gets a click, a wishlist, an install |
Handing a marketing art team a character sheet and calling it a brief skips every one of these differences. The art comes back correct and still fails at its actual job.
What Marketing Art Actually Has to Do
Key art, the hero image a marketing campaign is built around, has to do more than look like the game. It has to work as a stranger’s first impression, usually shrunk to the size of a thumbnail.
- Carry an emotional hook. A clear mood, tension, or promise the viewer reads instantly, not a character roster.
- Read as a silhouette. If the composition does not work in grayscale at a tiny size, it will not survive a crowded store page or feed.
- Leave room for overlays. Logos, ratings badges, and platform UI get placed on top of the art, not designed around it later.
- Survive being cropped. The same image often gets used as a square post, a vertical story, and a wide banner, each cut differently.
None of this appears in a production brief, because none of it is the production team’s problem to solve.
The Platform Specs a Production Brief Never Covers
A production brief specifies polycount and file formats. A marketing brief has to specify pixel dimensions for places the art will actually run. A few examples:
Steam store assets
| Asset | Dimensions | Aspect ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Header capsule | 920 × 430 px | 2.14:1 |
| Small capsule | 462 × 174 px | 2.66:1 |
| Vertical capsule | 748 × 896 px | 0.83:1 |
| Library hero | 3840 × 1240 px | 3.09:1 |
Steam also auto-generates a 120 × 45 px version of the small capsule for its browse grids. If the logo or focal point does not survive that shrink, the capsule fails before a shopper ever clicks it.
App store icons
| Platform | Dimensions | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| iOS App Store | 1024 × 1024 px | No transparency allowed |
| Google Play | 512 × 512 px | Alpha channel allowed |
| Android adaptive icon | 432 × 432 px | Center 66dp must survive mask cropping |
Common social crops
| Placement | Dimensions | Aspect ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram feed (square) | 1080 × 1080 px | 1:1 |
| Instagram feed (portrait) | 1080 × 1350 px | 4:5 |
| Instagram/TikTok story | 1080 × 1920 px | 9:16 |
| YouTube thumbnail | 1280 × 720 px | 16:9 |
Platforms update these numbers periodically, so confirm current specs before locking a brief. The pattern stays the same: every placement has its own canvas, and none of them match a production render.
This is the same mismatch that shows up in 3D modeling specs built for the wrong engine. An asset can be correct in isolation and still fail the moment it meets its actual platform.
What Goes Into a Real Marketing Art Brief
A marketing art brief needs its own document, separate from the production style guide. It should cover:
- Every target placement, with exact pixel dimensions and aspect ratio, not just “Steam and social.”
- Safe zones, marking where logos, ratings badges, or platform UI will sit on top of the art.
- The emotional hook, the single mood or message the piece has to land in under a second.
- Crop strategy, whether one hero image needs to adapt across ratios or each placement gets its own composition.
- Brand and tone references, separate from in-game art references, since a store page sells a feeling as much as a game.
- Text and logo files, if copy needs to sit directly on the art rather than get added after.
Skipping any of these is usually why a production partner delivers art that is technically excellent and still unusable for the campaign it was meant for.
Two Briefs, Not One
Studios that get the best marketing art rarely combine the two briefs. They write both, and hand over whichever one matches the actual deliverable.
A production brief still belongs in the conversation. Style references and character accuracy matter for key art too. What changes is the second layer on top: platform specs, emotional intent, and crop requirements. A production brief was never built to carry that layer. Skipping it is a common production risk, and it shows up as rework, missed launch windows, and assets re-cropped badly at the last minute.
What to Do Before Your Next Marketing Push
Pull your last few marketing assets. Check whether they were briefed with platform specs and an emotional hook. Or whether they were just repurposed production art with a logo added on top.
If you are preparing a Steam capsule, app icon, or a batch of social crops, write the marketing brief as its own document first. If you want to talk through what it should include, get in touch with your target placements and launch timeline.
Start by identifying your production stage, then define done criteria for each milestone before any art is produced. Share a complete brief covering style references, technical requirements, asset scope, and platform target, and agree on review cadence and ownership before production begins.
A typical milestone covers brief confirmation, a test or blockout pass, a mid-production review for complex assets, final delivery with a technical compliance check, and a short polish round. Each gate has its own done criteria agreed on in advance.
This depends on asset complexity and how detailed your brief is. Well-briefed production with clear style references usually needs one to two revision rounds, while more complex or style-sensitive work may need extra review at the blockout stage to catch direction issues early.
Identify the root cause first, whether that is a brief gap, a feedback bottleneck, a scope issue, or a pipeline problem. Communicate the situation transparently with your stakeholders and outsourcing team, and redefine scope or timeline proactively if the original plan is no longer realistic.
Include your production stage, a full asset list with priority order, done criteria for each stage, technical requirements per asset type, review cadence, and clear ownership at each approval point. The more specific the brief, the fewer surprises appear during production.